Current:Home > ScamsJury awards Abu Ghraib detainees $42 million, holds contractor responsible -RiskWatch
Jury awards Abu Ghraib detainees $42 million, holds contractor responsible
View
Date:2025-04-15 08:29:58
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — A U.S. jury on Tuesday awarded $42 million to three former detainees of Iraq’s notorious Abu Ghraib prison, holding a Virginia-based military contractor responsible for contributing to their torture and mistreatment two decades ago.
The decision from the eight-person jury came after a different jury earlier this year couldn’t agree on whether Reston, Virginia-based CACI should be held liable for the work of its civilian interrogators who worked alongside the U.S. Army at Abu Ghraib in 2003 and 2004.
The jury awarded plaintiffs Suhail Al Shimari, Salah Al-Ejaili and Asa’ad Al-Zubae $3 million each in compensatory damages and $11 million each in punitive damages.
The three testified that they were subjected to beatings, sexual abuse, forced nudity and other cruel treatment at the prison.
They did not allege that CACI’s interrogators explicitly inflicted the abuse themselves, but argued CACI was complicit because its interrogators conspired with military police to “soften up” detainees for questioning with harsh treatment.
CACI’s lawyer, John O’Connor, did not comment after Tuesday’s verdict on whether the company would appeal.
Baher Azmy, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights, which filed the lawsuit on the plaintiffs’ behalf, called the verdict “an important measure of Justice and accountability” and praised the three plaintiffs for their resilience, “especially in the face of all the obstacles CACI threw their way.”
The trial and subsequent retrial was the first time a U.S. jury heard claims brought by Abu Ghraib survivors in the 20 years since photos of detainee mistreatment — accompanied by smiling U.S. soldiers inflicting the abuse — shocked the world during the U.S. occupation of Iraq.
CACI had argued it wasn’t complicit in the detainees’ abuse. It said its employees had minimal interaction with the three plaintiffs in the case and any liability for their mistreatment belonged to the government.
As in the first trial, the jury struggled to decide whether CACI or the Army should be held responsible for any misconduct by CACI interrogators. The jury asked questions in its deliberations about whether the contractor or the Army bore liability.
CACI, as one of its defenses, argued it shouldn’t be liable for any misdeeds by its employees if they were under the control and direction of the Army. under a legal principle known as the “borrowed servants” doctrine.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that CACI was responsible for its own employees’ misdeeds.
The lawsuit was first filed in 2008 but was delayed by 15 years of legal wrangling and multiple attempts by CACI to have the case dismissed.
Lawyers for the three plaintiffs argued that CACI was liable for their mistreatment even if they couldn’t prove that CACI’s interrogators were the ones who directly inflicted the abuse.
The evidence included reports from two retired Army generals, who documented the abuse and concluded that multiple CACI interrogators were complicit in the abuse.
Those reports concluded that one of the interrogators, Steven Stefanowicz, lied to investigators about his conduct and that he likely instructed soldiers to mistreat detainees and used dogs to intimidate detainees during interrogations.
Stefanowicz testified for CACI at trial through a recorded video deposition and denied mistreating detainees.
veryGood! (998)
Related
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Hezbollah launches drone strike on base in northern Israel. Israel’s military says there’s no damage
- Jury duty phone scam uses threat of arrest if the victim doesn't pay a fine. Here's how to protect yourself.
- Mississippi governor says he wants young people to stop leaving the state
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Details on Prince Andrew allegations emerge from new Jeffrey Epstein documents — but no U.K. police investigation
- Former Pakistani prime minister Khan and his wife are indicted in a graft case
- Will the Peregrine lunar lander touch down on the moon? Company says it's unlikely
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Why there's a storm brewing about global food aid from the U.S.
Ranking
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- OSCE laments Belarus’ refusal to allow its monitors to observe February’s parliamentary vote
- Duct-taped and beaten to death over potty training. Mom will now spend 42 years in prison.
- Finding a remote job is getting harder, especially if you want a high-earning job
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Finding a remote job is getting harder, especially if you want a high-earning job
- 'Poor Things' director praises Bruce Springsteen during Golden Globes acceptance speech: Watch
- Michael Penix Jr. overcame injury history, but not Michigan's defense, in CFP title game
Recommendation
Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
Third Eye Blind reveals dates and cities for Summer Gods 2024 tour
Michigan's Jim Harbaugh has a title, seat at the 'big person's table.' So is this goodbye?
Under growing pressure, Meta vows to make it harder for teens to see harmful content
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Former Pakistani prime minister Khan and his wife are indicted in a graft case
Will the feds block a grocery megamerger? Kroger and Albertsons will soon find out
National Association of Realtors president Tracy Kasper resigns after blackmail threats